![]() |
General AreaGeneral area |

DCMS Digital identity and attributes consultation - OIX Consultation Response
DCMS September 2021 Consultation
standards
trust-framework
This response was compiled through a series of workshops with OIX members.
The responses are grouped into 3 sections, per the headings in the DCMS consultation:
- Creating a digital identity governance framework
- Enabling a legal gateway between public and private sector organisations for data checking
- Establishing the validity of digital identities and attributes.
The following table sums up OIX’s response to this consultation:
Area |
OIX Response |
Governance |
OIX is calling for regulator and the governing body to be separate entities. OIX is also calling for a public-private governance partnership. |
Scope of Governance Body |
The scope should include:
|
Framework Fees |
Should be levied in arrears or transactionally to prevent upfront barriers to investment |
Schemes |
OIX is supportive of the scheme construct, but more clarity needed on the role of a scheme. For instance, can a Scheme owner also play other roles in the framework? |
Escalation Points |
There needs to be an independent Digital Identity Ombudsman |
Fraud |
Consideration of framework wide fraud controls and information sharing (shared signals) is required |
Inclusion |
An IdP ‘exclusion report’ is not practical. The governance model should instead focus on who IdPs are Including then the delta is the excluded population. |
Access to government data |
Y/N APIs are not ideal. Richer APIs are required for many use cases. User consented release of data as verifiable credentials should be considered. Onward transfer of government data from IdPs to other parties should be allow with the user's consent. |
Validity of Digital IDs |
Digital IDs should be equivalent to a passport or driving license if they are GPG45 Medium. |